February 14, 2017
MICHAEL J. RANKIN reports on a recent case dealing with the validity of a priority lien that the Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services (DMAHS) filed against a decedent's estate for reimbursement of Medicaid benefits the decedent received. DMAHS determined the lien attached to all assets in the estate, including the decedent's one-third elective share against the augmented estate of his wife that included the proceeds from the sale of the couple's former marital home.
In this case, the decedent and his spouse lived together in their jointly-owned condominium before he began living in an assisted living facility in April 2007. On July 18, 2007, decedent's spouse executed her Last Will and Testament disinheriting the decedent and naming their children as the sole(...)
February 13, 2017
Barry Kozyra is representing two full service independent clinical laboratories operating in New Jersey and Pennsylvania in a prospective sale to an independent cannabis lab testing and media firm. Both companies provide a broad range of diagnostic tests (blood, urine, cholesterol, drugs) for patients, physicians, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and drug and alcohol treatment programs and clinics.
January 31, 2017
MICHAEL J. RANKIN reports a recent case dealing with trip cancellation insurance coverage and the policy's exclusion of coverage for a pre-existing medical condition.
Plaintiff purchased a trip to St. Lucia for himself and his family. On May 19, 2014, two days before his scheduled departure, Plaintiff purchased trip cancellation coverage (the "Policy") from the Defendant.
On the Policy's effective date, May 20, 2014, Plaintiff sought treatment from his dentist and was diagnosed with acute pericoronitis (inflammation of the gum tissue surrounding the crown portion of a partially erupted tooth). Plaintiff was advised by his dentist not to travel and thus cancelled his trip to St. Lucia. He also filed a claim for reimbursement under the Policy. Defendant denied Plaintiff's(...)
January 17, 2017
MICHAEL J. RANKIN reports a recent case where the Court granted the Defendant Township's motion for summary judgment because the Plaintiff failed to produce an expert report in discovery to prove liability against the Township's police officer who arrested him.
Plaintiff alleged that he was at his home when officers from the Township's police department arrived in response to a call that there was an altercation between him and his adult son. Plaintiff was arrested, and one of the officers allegedly injured Plaintiff's right shoulder while handcuffing him, causing a tear in his rotator cuff. Plaintiff alleged that the officer was negligent in the manner he handcuffed him.
The Defendant Township moved for summary judgment arguing Plaintiff's failure to serve it with a liability(...)
January 5, 2017
MICHAEL J. RANKIN reports a recent case where the Court granted Plaintiff's request to file a Notice of Claim outside of the ninety (90) day filing requirement prescribed by the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (TCA).
Generally, the TCA applies to tort actions against public entities (including State, any county, municipality, district, public authority, public agency and any other public subdivision or public body in the State) and their employees, and requires persons with claims against public entities and/or their employees to notice them of the claim within 90 days of accrual of such claims. Failure to satisfy the notice requirement can result in an absolute bar to recovery against a public entity and its employees.
In this case, Plaintiff was injured due to a slip and fall in(...)
